antagonist protocol造句

• Using GnRH antagonist protocol in high responders has been associated with significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates ( 62 versus 32 % ).
• The risk of OHSS is smaller when using GnRH antagonist protocol instead of GnRH agonist protocol for suppression of ovulation during ovarian hyperstimulation.
• On the other hand, the GnRH antagonist protocol has a lower risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome ( OHSS ), which is a life-threatening complication.
• Ovarian hyperstimulation also includes suppression of spontaneous ovulation, for which two main methods are available : Using a ( usually longer ) GnRH agonist protocol or a ( usually shorter ) GnRH antagonist protocol.
• In a standard long GnRH agonist protocol the day when hyperstimulation treatment is started and the expected day of later oocyte retrieval can be chosen to conform to personal choice, while in a GnRH antagonist protocol it must be adapted to the spontaneous onset of the previous menstruation.
• GnRH antagonist protocol has overall better results for expected poor and hyper-responders; A study of these protocols in women undergoing their first IVF and having a poor predicted response ( by an AMH level below 5 pmol / l by DSL assay ), using the GnRH antagonist protocol was associated with a substantial drop in cycle cancellation ( odds ratio 0.20 ) and required fewer days of gonadotrophin stimulation ( 10 days versus 14 days ) compared to GnRH agonist protocol.
• GnRH antagonist protocol has overall better results for expected poor and hyper-responders; A study of these protocols in women undergoing their first IVF and having a poor predicted response ( by an AMH level below 5 pmol / l by DSL assay ), using the GnRH antagonist protocol was associated with a substantial drop in cycle cancellation ( odds ratio 0.20 ) and required fewer days of gonadotrophin stimulation ( 10 days versus 14 days ) compared to GnRH agonist protocol.